Skip to main content

Will the COVID-19 Be the Death of the 20th Century Consumer Economy?

Somebody asked me, is COVID-19 a symptom or a cure?

What is wrong with us?













Symptoms of Consumer Atrophe
  • Warehouse & Westfield Closed – indicates downshift in consumption of non-essential consumer items by consumers
  • Cruise Ships, Air Travel, Tourist Operations Closed – indicates downshift in consumption of commodity tourism for non-essential purposes by consumers
  • Supply Chain & Manufacturing Closed – indicates downshift in consumption of primary commodities which feed into the non-essential consumer vehicles, appliances, furniture, clothing for consumers
  • Suspension of Rent, Mortgage and Credit Repayment Demands – indicates an emerging awareness of the debt slavery status of most consumers
  • Kids Riding Scooters in the Street – indicates a re-allocation of the biggest consumer misallocation of resources of all time

Prognosis for Recovery
  • Welfare emergency payments for consumers will be used much more thoughtfully as the concept of essentiality starts to invade the consumer economy
  • Forced haitus of shopping behaviour triggers a redevelopment of capacities for curiosity, boredom, trail and error,
  • Forced haitus of eating out behaviour triggers a redevelopment of capacities for creativity and planning, and new curiosity about the sources and supply chains of food.
  • Forced sessation of jobs stimulates new awareness of importance of meaningful work. (Note: Job is a transactional exchange of hours of labour as an input commodity to means of produciton for wealth creation – it is always paid and rarely remembered; Meanigful Work is a relational interaction of provision between people with skills and people with needs – can be unpaid, but it is never without meaning)
  • Forced haitus of schools triggers an appreciation of the importance of deep, wide learning - Schools are not daycare, universities are not degree-granting businesses.

These factors influence the prognosis that the Consumer Economy cannot recover, and indicate the metamorphosis of the consumer and re-emergence as the citizen/caregiver/assistant/teacher/problem solver...

Risk of Relapse
The most powerful interests in relapse to the consumer economy and consumer citizenship of the 20th Centruy will invest unlimited effort and wealth in managing the narative of recovery of the economy. They will not see any benefit for the transition to the regenerative economy and real-value relationships.

Innoculation

Thus, to reduce the risk of relapse, an innoculation of the citizenry as they transition to the work of regeneration will be crucial. The innoculation could be an effective counterfactual narative that elucidates the projects and relationships of the new regenerative economy, and builds the new financial organization and interaction platforms, laws and regulations that facilitate the transition and support the emergence and ascendency of regenerative enterprises.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about that Michael Moore Movie?

How dare they cast doubt on the sanctity of Renewable Energy? Why am I feeling like this about that movie? I have been asked by a LOT of people what I thought of Planet of the Humans ? Of course the movie has its story to tell and its own perspective that makes it interesting - it is a movie. The facts about renewable energy weren't off the mark. I don't know about the implied corporate handshake of our esteemed environmental leaders. I have only worked with Richard Heinberg, and have found him to be straight up. What it is that is disturbing for people is that their perspective is being shifted. You find out about climate change and climate destruction and you get over your shock and horror and denial, and then you want to bargain. You want to save the world. We will be good. We will use only good energy. We need wind and solar. We are good pe ople. And so the narrative is formed and the story begins to become impervious to facts.  You can find a talk that I

What is Energy Transition Engineering and why it is imperative, with Sus...

I had a really interesting conversation with Jason Marmon of US Energy. He has worked in Oil and Gas and then decided to work on energy transition. We had a nice time brainstorming what energy transition means for oil and gas industry.  Like everything these days, the go-to framework for debate is opposites positioning. In energy and climate change the position used to be "I'm not worried about climate change" vs "I'm freaked out about climate change". That framing didn't get a lot done, and it was masking the real issues, questions and potentials.  The opposites positioning has moved on a bit and now the "it's not happening" people are off in their own bubble cooking up conspiracies. Now the opposites positioning is "Energy transition is switching to renewables" vs "energy transition is hydrogen and CCS".  These two positions usually argue about the other not being able to replace fossil fuels at scale. That is correct

Peak Oil

Peak Oil!  There is a big problem, and we are going to have to deal with it. Is it possible to actually come out ahead? The evidence has long been clear that oil resources are finite, and production will peak and go into decline early this century.  The question is, why there has been so little high-level policy action?  What about the proposition that dealing with the complex changes involved in the transition to oil supply contraction requires new kinds of engineering modelling and analysis.   There are no miracle technologies that will mitigate the need for major policy, economic, infrastructure and land use changes.  Researchers have the responsibility to develop new methods and tools necessary for policy makers and planners to manage this unaccustomed change.  Without the right tools, the policy choice is between denying the problem and hoping for miracles.   With the right Transition Engineering tools, the policy choices are about which changes in land use, ince