Skip to main content

100% Renewable Energy

Can we have 100% Renewable Society in NZ?

Of course humans can organise their activities using 100% renewable energy. That project has been highly successful and demonstrated through hundreds of thousands of manifestations over 20,000-30,000 years.




The question of can "we" have 100% renewable generation in New Zealand now has two answers, yes and no. 
We are living in the fossil fuel age, we are fossil fuel man.  Our activities and expectations and understanding of ourselves is based on "energy-on-demand" which can be provided by fossil fuel supply and fossil fuel designed infrastructure.  The fact that we, as fossil fuel man, have these expectations does not change the fact that renewable energy is available in cycles and both regular and rarandom patterns and with a good deal of uncertainty.


Can we, as fossil fuel man, meet our expectations of how things are using only renewable energy?
 NO

Can we adapt to the habitat that does not have fossil fuels flushing through it? Where fossil fuels are used only for investment building (as all other finite resources are used) and renewable energy provides the energy for our daily activities (as do all species)?  Can we evolve into people whose activity systems and expectations match the availability of renewable energy, and thus become a "we" who use only 100% renewable energy? 

YES -  BUT  "we" will be different.  When you start to become comfortable with the changes in "us" that will happen as we evolve, then that next manifestation of the human system simply becomes a project; a Transition Engineering project.

www.transitionengineering.org

Wicked Problem
Here is why there are vested interests in fossil generation in New Zealand - because we expect a power grid that supplies all the power to all customers on-demand.  (e.g. the base load coal, peaking load petrol model of the 50's-60's that was developed in Europe and America)  Genesis Energy and Z Energy are not evil people who don't care about the world.  They are engineers and business people doing what society demands of them. There is no way to have supply-on-demand without the thermal generation unless the demand is always -even on the coldest day in the driest year- 10% below the renewable generation capacity. Adding wind generation does not increase the renewable capacity for a supply-on-demand system in a way that lets us mothball fossil generation, because wind is not available on-demand. 

As long as we keep talking like Fossil Fuel Man and thinking that if we can just find more renewable generation then "we" can go carbon neutral, then we perpetuate the problem.  This is a "wicked problem": making a fossil fuel system 100% renewable. It may seem like it should be do-able because there's all this solar and wind and wave energy out there, and we're so clever, and we now accept global warming... BUT, when you start to try to do the design work and try to deliver the on-demand services at a fossil fuel price from renewable sources, you see that it can't be done.
SORRY

Transition Projects
So what can be done?  Demand Response, Demand Management and Distributed Generation for Advanced Energy Systems. "Advanced Energy Systems" supply high quality services with compliance and feedback from the consumers and within the ecological limits of the regional system. 

What this means is that our innovation work needs to go into learning how to deal with variably available, reasonably priced base-load power, and very expensive supply-on-demand power from storage.  We have to be honest and admit that we do not know how to do this, as we have not even thought to do it before - given that we've been seeing ourselves as people who somehow deserve or should expect fossil fuels services at fossil fuel prices. However, there are some insights we can use to understand what it might be like to live with Advanced Energy Systems.

Have you ever known anyone with a caravan, or a holiday home that is off-grid?  Some retired people live in a big Winnebago in the desert in the winter, and they haul in water and use a solar panel and petrol generator to supply their power.  My sister and her family of 4 live off grid in the mountains of Colorado where they have a little wind generator, solar panels, diesel generator, a big shed full of batteries and a huge pile of wood off-cuts from their lumber mill that is powered with a very large diesel generator.

Imagine you live in an off grid house. Do you ever check their resources before you decide what activities to do?  This is the first adaptation of an AES. If you're in your batch, with a wind generator and a solar panel, and a stack of wood, you would obviously check your battery level if it's been cloudy and still for a while, and then check your generator fuel level, and if they are both a bit low, you might decide not to use a lot of power for lighting, and you might delay those activities until the sun comes out and you have power available.

This behaviour is such a critical adaptation that I can't emphasise it enough. People who exhibit this behaviour have a connection to their energy supply system, and they adjust the services they demand to match the energy source they have available. They have this information available through battery level indicators, current generation level indicators, and their observation of the weather. They have several different sources they can choose from. And if they have plenty because it is a sunny day, they may use more power for more discretionary things.

Renewable energy will never be “free” or "too cheap to meter" but it can be affordable for the essential services. Renewable energy is not free of environmental consequences either – the materials in your panels and wind generator have left a nasty footprint somewhere else on the planet. In the design of this off-grid house, would you decide to size your batteries and generation so that you could have the same energy service level as the grid?  If you were really rich, you could buy more panels and loads more batteries until the system could mimic a fossil fuel system, most of the time. But for moderate income people with the AES expectation and behaviour adaptation, they can get a pretty good level of service from a reasonably priced system.

Energy Efficiency
Of course, Advanced Energy Systems (AES) put the priority on providing services with utmost efficiency. But this is paramount for each individual customer because it allows them to get more services for the (sometimes) limited resources they have available. This is another key adaptation for people evolving to the Advanced Energy System. The fossil fuel man has to justify energy efficiency in economic terms of the cost savings from an equally acceptable lower efficiency alternative.  The AES customer reasons energy efficiency as a way to increase their service level within a given level of energy availability.  This is another behaviour that you see exhibited in the design of off-line systems.  Lights are very low power and there are a lot of them. Thus, you can just turn on one, and get something like candle light which is fine for sitting around talking. You can turn on more if you have tasks to do, and when battery or fuel levels are getting low, you turn everything off and go to bed and do other things. Refrigerators are small and highly efficient; electricity is not used for heat or cooking.  Showers have very low flow nozzles. 

Advanced Energy System
The Advanced Energy System looks like this in short:  The "large low hanging fruit" type renewable resources are developed by govt. and big power companies with the capital for investment in plant. Hydro and geothermal provide a base-load national grid. Electricity use from the national grid is designed and managed to meet essential services and to match the supply availability. This system provides plenty of power for household needs, work and market and education spaces, agriculture and processing.  However, these places all are designed for high utilization of local passive resources like day-lighting, ventilation, shade and solar heat. Big processing and manufacturing facilities like an aluminium smelter must look for power to meet their needs, not from the national grid, but from resources they develop for themselves.  This is where distributed generation comes in.  Big users have to find their own big supplies to top up what they can get from the shared resource of the grid.  Individual businesses like banks who decide it's valuable for them to have power on demand will spend more and install their own power collection and storage systems. These are more expensive than the grid power, but there are businesses and households who have a higher value on more power, and so invest in providing it for themselves. People in an AES probably have several options, like wood pellet fires for heat as well as good passive solar design.

Transportation
The issue of adding transportation to this Advanced Energy System is the biggest challenge to our perception of who "we" are, and what our expectations are of what we "need".  Fossil Fuel Man expects 100% individual mobility on-demand, and is willing to allocate an extraordinary proportion of their wealth into maintaining this mobility.  (e.g. look at how much of your budget goes into cars and how much of your council and national budget goes into roads and signals and police and ACC and emergency services and funerals for car accident victims). Can the environment provide this expectation of 100% mobility on-demand from its current energy flows and not from those stored 100 million years ago?
NO 

Again, it's our expectations that have to evolve, not just our technologies.  What will it be like, what will we do?  There aren't any answers just yet, as people haven't even asked the question, they've been too distracted with dreaming that somehow biofuels could be substituted for fossil fuels or that the mythical "natural trend" to lower carbon fuels would bring about the hydrogen age. 

The AEMSLab research group took a hard look at the question of fossil fuel free transport in 2003, and we found that an Advanced Energy Transport System is a profound evolution from a fossil fuel transport system. It requires that communities, urban/rural/regional be designed for it.  It requires that manufacturing, processing, production and waste management be designed for it.  It requires integration of the built environment and land use, but it also requires new multi-purpose public vehicles and evolved expectations and activity patterns. We named this place that we explored Silke, after the student who built a physical model of the AETS city as we discovered it.  It was quite an adventure to go there to Silke, as it challenged so many of our Fossil Fuel Man assumptions.  But we found the people were actually doing quite well, even if they did live a bit differently that we do. There were a lot of things that were definitely better for them.  We were all profoundly changed by our visit to Silke, and we've since been working on developing models of some of their AETS ideas so we can understand how they might work for us, and how we might actually be able to evolve from our rather dependant existence to a much more civilised one.  


Where do we start?  Is it by showing you all Silke so you will understand?  Or should we first explain to you why your biofuel and hydrogen and hybrid dreams are not actually low carbon sustainable transitions so that you'll stop being distracted? 

Conclusion
Can we have a 100% renewable energy system that supplies power on demand at fossil fuel prices? 
NO - We can't increase renewable capacity to keep ahead of unconstrained demand, in particular peak demand, and there is no way that the new renewables and the massive storage facilities which would be needed will be available at the old prices.

Can we have a 100% renewable energy system that provides services for well-being that are economically viable and ecologically integrated (e.g. and Advanced Energy System)?
YES BUT we have to start thinking about adapting and evolving, not just getting more.  Someone will have to do a lot of thinking and innovating and developing of the new components that will transform our Fossil Fuel energy system into and Advanced Energy System. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about that Michael Moore Movie?

How dare they cast doubt on the sanctity of Renewable Energy? Why am I feeling like this about that movie? I have been asked by a LOT of people what I thought of Planet of the Humans ? Of course the movie has its story to tell and its own perspective that makes it interesting - it is a movie. The facts about renewable energy weren't off the mark. I don't know about the implied corporate handshake of our esteemed environmental leaders. I have only worked with Richard Heinberg, and have found him to be straight up. What it is that is disturbing for people is that their perspective is being shifted. You find out about climate change and climate destruction and you get over your shock and horror and denial, and then you want to bargain. You want to save the world. We will be good. We will use only good energy. We need wind and solar. We are good pe ople. And so the narrative is formed and the story begins to become impervious to facts.  You can find a talk that I...

What is Energy Transition Engineering and why it is imperative, with Sus...

I had a really interesting conversation with Jason Marmon of US Energy. He has worked in Oil and Gas and then decided to work on energy transition. We had a nice time brainstorming what energy transition means for oil and gas industry.  Like everything these days, the go-to framework for debate is opposites positioning. In energy and climate change the position used to be "I'm not worried about climate change" vs "I'm freaked out about climate change". That framing didn't get a lot done, and it was masking the real issues, questions and potentials.  The opposites positioning has moved on a bit and now the "it's not happening" people are off in their own bubble cooking up conspiracies. Now the opposites positioning is "Energy transition is switching to renewables" vs "energy transition is hydrogen and CCS".  These two positions usually argue about the other not being able to replace fossil fuels at scale. That is correct ...